By: Burk Kathleen

Article compliments of REIX

Navigating Security Cameras in Home Showings

by 

Many homeowners use security cameras and smart doorbells to monitor their property inside and out. While these devices enhance safety, they can also record during showings. As a buyer’s agent, you should assume that you and your clients are being recorded at all times.

Homeowners may use surveillance footage to gauge a buyer’s interest, potentially influencing negotiations. If discussions about pricing, budget, or repair concerns are shared with the seller, it could weaken the buyer’s position.

Legal Considerations

When showing homes, it is essential to be aware of potential surveillance cameras and the legal liabilities that could arise. In an era where smart home technology is growing, agents must exercise caution to protect their clients and themselves. The key points to remember:

  1. Recording Audio Without Consent is Illegal – In Canada, it is illegal to record private conversations without the consent of at least one party involved.
  2. Video Surveillance in Private Spaces – Homeowners can have video surveillance, but they must avoid recording areas where visitors expect privacy, such as bathrooms.
  3. Disclosure Requirements – Homeowners are not always required to inform agents or buyers about cameras. If an agent suspects recording, it’s best to proceed with caution.

Understanding Liabilities

Failing to recognize the risks of surveillance could lead to legal issues or loss of client trust. Making negative remarks about a property can result in a defamation claim. A seller recording a conversation, and gaining confidential buyer information, can affect the transaction outcome. Therefore, to ensure privacy and trust throughout the process all parties need to be aware of these risks and take appropriate measures.

Best Practices for BUYER’S Agents

  • Possible Cameras – Advise clients to assume they are being recorded. Keep conversations about pricing, negotiation, features, or personal opinions, until after leaving the property.
  • Check the Listing for Disclosure – Some listings may indicate whether surveillance is present. Review the MLS listing and confirm with the listing agent if necessary.
  • Report Suspicious Surveillance – If you notice a camera in an unexpected or inappropriate area, document it and report it to the listing agent.

Best Practices for SELLER’S Agents

  • Encourage Sellers to Disable Cameras – While it is not illegal to have security cameras, it is best practice to turn them off during showings to ensure buyers feel comfortable.
  • Avoid Recording Audio – If cameras must remain active, ensure that they do not record conversations to avoid legal risks.
  • Disclose Surveillance Devices – If the home has active cameras, include a disclosure in the listing description and notify the buyer’s agent before showing.
...
By: Burk Kathleen


The Realities and Rewards of Log Home Ownership in Bragg Creek


There’s something magnetic about a log home.

Maybe it’s the way sunlight filters through pine beams at 6am. Or how the scent of wood lingers in a way drywall never can. Maybe it’s the deep silence they hold in winter, when snow wraps around the roof like a second skin.

Log homes aren’t just structures. They’re living, breathing companions to the land. And when built and maintained properly, they’ll outlast just about everything else.

But—and this matters—owning one isn’t for everyone. It takes care. It takes know-how. It takes planning.

As someone who lives, works, and sells in Bragg Creek, I’ve walked through more log homes than I can count. I’ve seen the spectacular, the flawed, and the tragic. This isn’t about selling the romance. This is about telling the truth—and helping you make the right decision with your eyes wide open.


The Magic of a Log Home

There’s no drywall echo. No generic feel. A well-built log home is a legacy—it feels grounded, timeless, and elemental. These homes are the antidote to everything synthetic. They sit quietly in the forest as if they’ve always been there. Buyers who seek log homes aren’t just looking for space—they’re looking for connection. To land. To stillness. To something that can’t be replicated in new builds.

But beauty alone won’t keep your investment solid.


Log Home Maintenance: What Every Owner Needs to Know

Quarterly Maintenance Tasks:

  • Inspect logs for cracks, mildew, or sap leaks (especially after freeze-thaw cycles)

  • Check gutters and downspouts for blockages

  • Trim back vegetation at least 2 feet from walls

  • Look for signs of insect activity near base logs

Annual Must-Do List:

  • Pressure wash exterior (low PSI only)

  • Recoat stain every 3–5 years (sooner on sun-exposed walls)

  • Reseal joints and log ends as needed

  • Inspect foundation and roofline for signs of shifting or movement

  • Test smoke/CO detectors and inspect chimney/stove pipe

Professional Services I Recommend:


5 Benefits of Owning a Log Home

  1. Natural insulation and energy efficiency

  2. Aesthetic appeal that appreciates over time

  3. Structurally sound with proper care—logs are incredibly durable

  4. Unique resale appeal in niche markets like Bragg Creek

  5. Feels like a retreat, every single day

5 Challenges of Owning a Log Home

  1. Requires regular inspection and maintenance

  2. Vulnerable to UV damage and moisture without proper sealing

  3. Pest control is essential

  4. Insurance can be more complex

  5. Fewer contractors specialize in log home repair or renovation


Final Thought

If you’re considering buying or selling a log home in Bragg Creek, make sure you’re working with someone who actually understands the product. A log home isn’t just “another listing.” It’s a specialized asset—and it deserves a specialized approach.

I’m Kathleen Burk. I’ve sold more log homes than most agents have walked through. I understand how to market them, how to value them, and how to spot problems before they sabotage a deal.

Thinking of making a move? Let’s have that conversation.

www.liveintherockies.life

...
By: Burk Kathleen

Why Some Country Homes Sit—and Others Sell Quietly for Millions

In this part of Alberta, some homes go stale. They hit the market with clean finishes, decent staging, solid upgrades—and still, they sit.

Then there are the others. No sign. No open house. Just a quiet sale, full price, fast.

The difference isn’t luck. And it’s not timing.

It’s strategy.


1. Rural Homes Are Not Suburban Products

You’re not selling a house. You’re selling space, peace, and a lifestyle that doesn’t exist inside city limits.

The buyer who wants Bragg Creek or Millarville isn’t looking for granite countertops. They’re looking for quiet. For beauty. For a place where they can wake up and not hear traffic.

Most agents market rural properties like inner-city infills. It doesn’t work.


2. Features Don’t Sell—Emotion Does

You can say three bedrooms and vaulted ceilings, or you can show a buyer what it’s like to drink coffee while elk walk through the trees outside your window.

The difference is connection. The kind that leads to an offer.


3. The Strongest Sales Happen Before the Market Sees Them

Some of my most successful sales never hit MLS. They didn’t need to.

The right buyer was already there. Already watching. Already pre-qualified.

This isn’t about hype or overexposure. It’s about knowing who your property is for—and knowing how to reach them before the market eats your edge.



If you’re serious about selling, and you want it done right the first time, quietly and without friction, reach out.

www.liveintherockies.life

...
By: Burk Kathleen

Saying the Quiet Part Out-Loud

With The Fall of the Bay Is It Time for a Sovereign Canada?

Canada is flailing—romanticizing railway hotels and faded department stores while pretending it's on the cutting edge of justice and identity. As Hudson’s Bay Company crumbles, we aren’t watching a store fail. We’re watching a colonial cornerstone crack. And instead of mourning, we should be asking: what was this company, really?

It was the Crown’s corporate spearhead. The first private-public partnership in conquest. A trade empire that mapped, divided, and monetized land that was never theirs to begin with. This wasn’t commerce—it was colonization. And the Crown? It still sits at the top of the pyramid.

The British people didn’t orchestrate famines, occupation, and mass land theft—the Crown did. A monarchy backed by weapons, legislation, and the Church. Wherever the Crown landed, starvation followed. In India, tens of millions died in famines engineered for profit. In Ireland, over a million starved while food was exported. In Sudan, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria, starvation and forced labor were used as policy. In Jamaica, Barbados, and Trinidad, sugar plantations were run by enslaved Africans. In Australia, Indigenous peoples were wiped out through land seizure and food deprivation. And in Canada, genocide was carried out through starvation policies, residential schools, and systemic erasure. The Crown didn’t govern—it extracted. It didn’t unify—it divided. It didn’t build—it fed off the bodies of the already broken.

Did my Irish ancestors flee engineered famine only to land in another corner of the same empire? Did my Scottish lineage arrive here after being cleared from ancestral land—poverty-stricken, desperate, and displaced by Crown policy? My German ancestry—driven by war, poverty, and the promise of freedom, sought refuge here too. What does it mean to carry within me both the displaced and the displacing?.This isn’t a simple inheritance. It’s a tangle of trauma, resilience, and complicity. It forces me to ask—what do I owe to this place, and what do I owe to truth and what do I owe my ancestors who made their way here and built a life here? What do I owe to the legacy they started four generations ago? How will I add to that legacy and story and make room for my children and thier children to add to it and shape it and pass it on again?

 Like an estimated 32% of Canadians  I too carry British ancestry, I know it is possible to be proud of that cultural inheritance while still rejecting the power structure that abused its own people—and most everyone else. The more I say the quiet part out loud the more I believe that reconciliation is impossible and the attempts made carry insult and injury WHILE the Crown remains intact. We can rename streets, issue apologies, and build monuments—but if the system that orchestrated the harm still presides over us, is that justice or just performance? The monarchy didn’t just symbolize colonialism, It legislated it, and while Queen Elizabeth’s image softened the truth for many—calm, ceremonial, and distant—King Charles reveals the machinery beneath the mask. For me, there’s no warmth here, no illusion of kindness, just the cold, reptilian legacy of empire and yet we still swear allegiance. We still print his face on our money. We still allow his emissaries to approve our laws. What, exactly, are we reconciling if we won’t confront the root - the Hydra.

Canada’s colonial history isn’t just about the British monarchy—it’s about an entire empire of control, a power network between the Crown and the Roman Catholic Church that built this country on subjugation, starvation, and subservience. The Church and the monarchy weren’t just partners; they were one and the same, two arms of the same machine. One took land, the other took souls. One wielded laws, the other wielded fear and they played their roles well. The Church ran the residential schools, stripping Indigenous children of their language, culture, and humanity, while the Crown dictated who was "civilized" enough to own land, vote, or even exist as a legal person. The Catholic Church, acting as the moral enforcer of empire, justified every act of conquest, all in the name of "saving" those they sought to dominate.

And now, in 2025, we are expected to believe that reconciliation can happen within the very framework that created the harm? That we can redefine Canadian identity while still bowing to the same monarchy that signed the orders of our oppression? The illusion of progress is just another method of control.

This is where my work collides with my conscience. I sell land. I value homes. But do I also, in some deeper way, participate in a system that was never designed to serve its people—only to manage them? Wasn’t real estate always the Crown’s endgame—land divided, titled, and taxed? Ownership, not as stewardship, but as control? Are we still using their blueprints? Every title deed is built on exclusion. Every parcel is drawn from a map etched in conquest. We call it real estate. But is it just colonization with better branding?

Why do we still call this a sovereign nation while we kneel, symbolically and legally, to a monarch across the ocean? The Americans cut the cord in 1776. What exactly are we waiting for? Isn’t it time to imagine a Canadian republic—one accountable not to empire, but to its people? Isn’t it time to build something truly our own?

What would it look like to claim not just property, but purpose? What might emerge if we finally ended the illusion—if we released the Crown, let its relics crumble, and stepped fully into the unknown? Could we build a country that isn’t inherited from conquest, but authored by conscience? Could we live not as subjects, but as sovereigns? 

Will we stand from bent knee and lift our bowed head as we watch the ships set sail and head east into the sunrise so we can face the discomfort on a grass-roots level of what it feels like to stand shoulder to shoulder with all who call Canada home? To do what we can to reconcile a past and tend to left over wounds that we allow to be continually salted? 

Countries That Have Fully Freed Themselves from the Crown (Now Republics):

  1. United States – 1776

  2. Ireland – 1949 (formally became a republic and left the Commonwealth)

  3. India – 1950

  4. Pakistan – 1956

  5. South Africa – 1961

  6. Ghana – 1960

  7. Sri Lanka – 1972

  8. Guyana – 1970

  9. Trinidad and Tobago – 1976

  10. Dominica – 1978

  11. Zimbabwe – 1980

  12. Malta – 1974

  13. Mauritius – 1992

  14. Fiji – 1987 (after two military coups, cut ties and became a republic)

  15. The Gambia – 1970 (left monarchy), briefly returned, left again in 2015

  16. Seychelles – 1976 (gained independence, republic status immediately)

  17. Barbados – 2021 (the most recent to remove the Queen as head of state)

Canada remains one of just 14 Commonwealth realms where the British monarch is still the official head of state, alongside countries like Australia, New Zealand, and Jamaica. But many of these are now actively questioning that allegiance.

If you are interested about learning more on this topic visit: Citizens for a Canadian Republic 

Article of interest and inspiration for this post: The Untold Story of The Hudson’s Bay Company

Yours in truth always,

Kathleen

...
By: Burk Kathleen

Buying things like meme coins requires evaluating sentiment, in 2025 we evaluate sentiment by searching for trending topics and hash tags as well as scouring reddit and quora despite bots, trolls and massively shorted positions. We must then look at the trends like a wave and use it as a launch pad from which to make a decision. Meme stocks aren’t real estate but sentiment is as important in real estate as numbers and data.

How do we even begin a journey of understanding what’s actually happening in Real Estate—the hard numbers, the economic drivers, and the underlying patterns that dictate whether you win in this market or get played by it. I believe understanding things starts with our willingness to trust ourselves, our instincts and our intuition. Interactions and relationships can become field research and asking better questions of the people in our lives can be a way to understand sentiment pertaining to real estate markets.

The truth is, the market doesn’t control you—unless you let it. Right now, I am analyzing where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re heading so that my clients don’t just list homes or make offers. They move deliberately, with confidence, and on their own terms.

I have never been interested in being a generic presence in real estate. I built my career outside the herd, working with the kind of clients who value privacy, autonomy, and results. My job isn’t to tell you that every market is a “great time to buy and sell.” My job is to make sure that when you move, it’s because you dictate the terms, not the other way around.

Right now, we are standing in a market that isn’t what it was two years ago. It isn’t even what it was six months ago. But that doesn’t mean it’s bad—it means it’s changing. And change is only a threat to those who don’t understand it.

Our spring market in and around Bragg Creek came on strong this year in late January/early February , without warning, and it faded just as quickly. I stepped back to get a read on things while I committed to the work that was required to sell the existing rural listings I had on the market which left no available room for new work. We were 100% successful, selling each one, however the grit and grind required by my phenomenal sellers was unexpected and your efforts commendable. Each sale came with no less than one collapsed offer, in some cases two, many threats of offers that never came to fruition and the general expectation that these properties were to be in tip top shape with no deficiencies. Once these properties were confirmed as sold I gathered data from numbers and most importantly experience and as some of you know, deferred or declined new listings and most new buyers due to my lack of understanding of “sentiment”. 

Mid March and a ton of data brings me to my own launch pad after evaluating sentiment. I am beyond pleased that we took a minute and delayed things, as chasing a market to correct course due to poor timing is never pleasant for anyone, it is always frustrating and reliably disappointing. 

The beauty of a calibration is this—my clients, whether buying or selling, are armed with preparation, precision, and the ability to execute without hesitation. In a market that punishes uncertainty, they will not be the ones second-guessing their moves. Precision beats reaction every time and in a market that rewards those who move with strategy and punishes those who scramble to adjust, the advantage belongs to those who understand the timing before they act. The difference between controlled success and market-driven disappointment isn’t luck—it’s calculated execution.

...
By: Kathleen Burk

Let Me Tell You a Story

I got kicked out of Social Studies in grade 5 or 6 (I can’t remember) for asking one simple question: "Who wrote this textbook?"

I wasn’t trying to be difficult. I wasn’t looking to stir up rebellion. I genuinely wanted to know—who decided what was true? But my teacher didn’t appreciate my curiosity. Instead of answering, she sent me to the hallway.

I can safely blame this on my provocative and charismatic father, who always reminded me that there were three sides to every story—yours, mine, and the truth. He was the kind of man who made you question everything, who saw authority not as a guiding force, but as something that always needed to be challenged. He was the person who unapologetically blew my mind when he told me, “We aren’t the good guys if you’re on the other side of the war.”

Equally responsible is my mother, who refused to encourage any position until the author and the financier of the source had been examined. She taught me that knowledge without context and reason is just someone else’s version of reality.

But now, truth feels complicated. People are too busy for context, for white papers and research. The lifelong learner in me bends toward philosophy and theory, ambiguity and fluidity—probably more than is appreciated, I suspect—but with that comes intellectual freedom and ongoing self-reform.

Conversationally, though? Suggesting that 2 + 2 is subjective or that math is godlike and not as absolute as we may pretend doesn’t tend to go over well at dinner parties.

I was punished, shamed, rejected, and ejected at 10 or 11 years old for being thirsty for curiosity, senseability, and engagement. Thank God I had climbed the ranks of the elementary social hierarchy, at least to a place where getting kicked out of class for being an asshole who is smart was way more socially acceptable than getting kicked out for being a smart-ass.

Fast-forward to university, where the pursuit of a philosophy degree was only the beginning of a lifelong (so far) love of introspection, rabbit holes, abstract thought, puzzles, patterns, and the exploration of thought and nonsense.

And that’s exactly how I ended up here—down an intellectual rabbit hole of 1776.

I never learned about the American Revolution in school. In a declaration of embarrassing fact: I have only just recently been pouring over American history and the magnitude of 1776. I had always assumed it was just another date on a timeline, another battle, another event we were loosely aware of as Canadians but never really connected to.

But I see it differently now. It wasn’t just a war; it was an existential break. A full divorce from the monarchy and all that came with it—its power, its legacy, its sins. The birth of a nation that, for better or worse, chose self-determination over allegiance.

And that’s when the next question hit me: Why haven’t we done the same?

Why do Canadians struggle with a coherent national identity? Why do we wrestle with our own patriotism, or seem vaguely embarrassed by it? Why does our history always feel like something borrowed rather than something built?

Maybe it’s because we’re not a fully independent nation. Maybe it’s because, despite our polite insistence otherwise, we remain an extension of the Crown, tethered to an institution that carries centuries of blood, conquest, and control.

We like to think of ourselves as separate, but the reality is we have never truly stood on our own. Even now, our head of state is a monarch in another country. Our constitutional system still bows to a royal assent. The weight of colonialism is baked into our institutions, our treaties, our very sense of identity.

So here’s my question: Will our national struggles ever end until we finally sever the tie?

Maybe Canada won’t find its real sense of pride until we become a republic—until we write our own story. Not Britain’s, not America’s. Ours.

Maybe the absence of overt Canadian patriotism isn’t because we’re a humble nation, but because we don’t yet know what it means to be our own nation at all.

And maybe, just maybe, it’s time to find out. 

Yours in truth always,

Kathleen 




Reference: https://www.canadian-republic.ca/



...
1
2
3
...
9